Broadly speaking, yes. The details may get hairy, but those are probably better dealt with in issue specific threads.
Good luck, and don't hesitate to bring up any other questions. ~CK On Thursday, February 27, 2014 5:29:34 PM UTC-6, Dennis Marwood wrote: > > OK I think you are talking about something like > https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/intro/tutorial02/#adding-related-objectswhere > I could just insert a slider type of entry and then a text entry and > so on. Is that it? > > On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 14:49:55 UTC-8, C. Kirby wrote: >> >> It doesn't have to, I guess it depends on how involved the creation tools >> are that you create. Quick and dirty idea off the top of my head: >> If the authoring tools define post widgets (body, text, scroller, video, >> etc) you could let authors drag and drop the elements as they wish. On the >> model side, make all resources extend a base class of BlogResource type, >> then for each blog post have a many to many through table that stores >> ordering: >> PostID(foriegn=blog) >> ResourceID(genericforeignkey to blog resource) >> OrderID(int) >> >> or somthing like that. >> >> Regards, >> ~CK >> >> On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 4:18:14 PM UTC-6, Dennis Marwood wrote: >>> >>> Won't this force my blog posts to all be the same. i.e. Text then a >>> image scroller? >>> How would I handle the case where a blog post was Text, image scroller, >>> text, image scroller? >>> >>> On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 13:35:01 UTC-8, C. Kirby wrote: >>>> >>>> It sounds like your implementation is a little skewed. >>>> If a blog post is made of multiple resources (summary, body, multiple >>>> image collections, etc.) You should probably have a model or models with >>>> the appropriate fields/relationships. That way your template can house >>>> all >>>> of the template language, and you build a single, user facing blog post >>>> from the elements in the blog post model(s). >>>> This also gives you the benefit of making the various resources >>>> available in other ways (eg. Show all my image collections, share >>>> collections, etc) as well as change your layout in the future without >>>> having hard-coded template calls in your content. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> ~CK >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 3:18:54 PM UTC-6, Dennis Marwood wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. I look forward to trying this soon. >>>>> >>>>> I feel like I may be trying to swim against the current with this. Is >>>>> this a problem with the way that I have decided to implement my blog or >>>>> are >>>>> these workarounds typical for django applications? >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 04:15:15 UTC-8, Tom Evans wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:29 AM, Dennis Marwood <dennis...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > Thanks. I believe this is what I am looking for. However I am still >>>>>> running >>>>>> > into an issue w/ the fact that I am pulling my blog entries from >>>>>> the db. >>>>>> > This is causing the template to interpret the {% image_slider %} as >>>>>> a >>>>>> > string. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > From view.py: >>>>>> > def blog(request): >>>>>> > entries = >>>>>> > >>>>>> Project.objects.filter(destination="blog").order_by('-creation_date') >>>>>> > return render(request, 'content.html', {"entries": entries, >>>>>> > "page_title": >>>>>> "Blog", >>>>>> > "description": >>>>>> "Blog"}) >>>>>> > >>>>>> > And in content.html: >>>>>> > {% for each in entries %} >>>>>> > <p>{{ each.entry }}</p> >>>>>> > {% endfor %} >>>>>> > >>>>>> > And a blog entry: >>>>>> > Hello! Check out this collection of images. {% image_slider %} And >>>>>> this >>>>>> > collection! {% image_slider %} >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I don't want to hard code the inclusion tag in the content.html. >>>>>> Instead I >>>>>> > want to call it from the blog post. Is this possible? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. You will need to write a custom template tag to parse the >>>>>> contents of the object as a template, render it within the current >>>>>> context and return the generated data. >>>>>> >>>>>> Writing a custom template tag: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/howto/custom-template-tags/#writing-custom-template-tags >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Rendering templates to string: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/ref/templates/api/#rendering-a-context >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Your content.html would then look something like this, assuming you >>>>>> called the custom tag 'render': >>>>>> >>>>>> {% for each in entries %} >>>>>> <p>{% render each.entry %}</p> >>>>>> {% endfor %} >>>>>> >>>>>> Beware the massive security holes if you allow users to generate >>>>>> content that your site then renders as a template. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> Tom >>>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/ac308365-e0b8-4a88-be8b-9e691229c31a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.