On 20/06/2017 2:22 AM, 'Victor Hooi' via Django users wrote:
If you go down the user-profiles route - how would you handle managing
each of those via the Django Admin?
I use group permissions to reveal or hide models in the Admin main menu.
I use admin, editor, author and for example authors cannot see/edit
company, addresses or phone numbers . And so on.
For example - say you have 3 user "types" - each just being User, with
a different profile linked to it. How would you manage each of those
via the admin interface?
I do a similar thing. Any substance can have one or two of a few
physical_state(s). Different physical forms have different data to be
collected. However, all of them have a subset of the same data. So I use
a core_fields model with abstract = True and all the solid, liquid, gas
etc models inherit from core fields. All the attributes and methods in
cvommon live on the core_fields abstract model.
In the Admin I detect the substance physical_state and only present the
appropriate models. One choice is solid and liquid. If that is selected
the substance gets both "profiles"
For a new substance, all those I select one of the choices and save to
make the unwanted profiles disappear. Provided no data was entered in
the unwanted models, they never get created.
You need a bit of jiggery pokery in admin.py but it can be done. I'll
try and get some time later to show you.
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 at 17:53 James Schneider <jrschneide...@gmail.com
<mailto:jrschneide...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Jun 18, 2017 10:11 PM, "Victor Hooi" <victorh...@gmail.com
<mailto:victorh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Say you have multiple custom users, each inheriting from
AbstractUser. The docs mention setting AUTH_USER_MODEL:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.11/topics/auth/customizing/#substituting-a-custom-user-model
However, what happens if you have *multiple* custom users -
which would you set it to?
The answer is to rethink your user model(s). The idea being that a
'user' should be thought about at a very high level.
There should only be one canon user model in use as far as system
authentication is concerned. The 'type' of user rarely warrants
the use of a separate model, rather the type would typically be
made available as an attribute of your system User (notice the
capital U), restricted by either a static list of possible choices
(https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.11/ref/models/fields/#choices)
or by utilizing a foreign key to another model containing the list
of potential user types.
Your User model (which can be named anything you like, I'm just
referencing User for brevity) should contain only a minimal amount
of information needed for authentication, and any information that
would be needed regularly on every request.
Ideally, the User 'type' would be made a part of the User Profile,
which can be recalled quickly via a 1to1 FK relationship
(https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.11/topics/auth/customizing/#extending-the-existing-user-model).
One of the few cases where this information could be stored
directly on the User is when the authorization system (permissions
and user tests for access) are contingent on the 'type' of user
you are examining, which effectively turns it into a role.
However, unless you have a static (unchanging) list of user roles
(which is a more apropos description anyway), you may still
consider using a M2M relationship to a role table and update the
User manager to automatically join the two tables when users are
queried.
Having separate 'user' models as you've mentioned leads to the
exact issue you've brought up. If you are trying to find a user,
you need a separate query for every type of user you have in every
location where you need a list of users or perform searching for
specific users. This causes an artificial and unnecessary
inflation of the number of queries run for each request, and
complicates the code trying to parse multiple sets of results.
Proxy models may also be an alternative
(https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.11/topics/db/models/#proxy-models).
However, those can be a bit unwieldy to handle and present the
same issues as pulling a user list.
-James
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/django-users/UrUN9PWKwMs/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email
to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
<mailto:django-users@googlegroups.com>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/CA%2Be%2BciWkc8XrQEnS9ET12Y%3D5nToFV29QTqHwOrcPMX_rvEM17g%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/CA%2Be%2BciWkc8XrQEnS9ET12Y%3D5nToFV29QTqHwOrcPMX_rvEM17g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Django users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
<mailto:django-users@googlegroups.com>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/CAMnnoUK%3Db848dQjCSUvUv45-2P8sZx1tRj-%3D0%2BzMeNA7sCiKSw%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/CAMnnoUK%3Db848dQjCSUvUv45-2P8sZx1tRj-%3D0%2BzMeNA7sCiKSw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/769be229-6d1e-834f-6124-fb634a806455%40dewhirst.com.au.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.