Hummm... looks like I own you an apology, Merric. I was wrong about how to access the replicated data on the slave hosts. I was either thinking about clusters or I was flat out wrong.
But what James said, and kemuri, approachs my mistake. I hope it helps you :) On 4/9/07, Merric Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The official documentation on MySQL 5.1 "Using Replication for > ScaleOut" is explicit and states that it is the application (Django) > that needs to send the writes to the Master and the Reads to the > Slaves. Unless I'm wrong this would rule out using replication with > Django. > > The quote from the MySQL document is below. According to quote changing > Django to handle replication should be relatively trivial (but beyond my > skill set at present), - does anybody know whether any work has been > done on this? > > MerMer -- Julio Nobrega - http://www.inerciasensorial.com.br --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
