Generally, GeoDjango is as stable as trunk (the latest merge was today -- we're in sync up to r6990). This topic was discussed in-depth in a previous thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/f6d73b6ec1be2f03 > I took a look at the revisions and it seems to be updated from trunk, but > from my > understanding its not exactly stable? I'm aware that GeoDjango's installation requirements are burdensome, however, this should not be confused with "instability." The current installation situation should improve as binary packages for GEOS 3.0 and GDAL 1.5 become more readily available. Best Regards, -Justin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
