Hello,

I think there are a few open-tickets for this topic:

http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1051
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6148
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2120

Bernd

On Jul 11, 3:50 pm, Jon Brisbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hardly ever put anything in the Postgres "public" schema except for
> things I want exposed to all applications and tables within a
> database. I usually segregate the tables into schemas based on their
> relationship to one another. With several hundred tables in the
> database, this gets pretty critical. I noticed Django doesn't have any
> explicit schema support, but instead uses app prefixes. I realize that
> some would argue that's functionally equivalent. But not when you're
> looking at all those tables in pgAdmin.
>
> Would it be difficult to add schema support for those databases that
> support it rather than using the app_table naming methodology? Just
> create a schema called "app" and then the table named after the model.
> I guess it's really a personal preference, but I'm used to working
> with schemas because of the large number of tables in our warehouse.
> Maybe we're unusual in how heavily we rely on Postgres, but it's a
> convention that I've grown to prefer over the past several years. It
> also prevents me from using Django in our mission-critical apps
> because all our tables are segregated into schemas and we use several
> tables in different schemas. I don't get the impression that Django is
> necessarily targeted at the large, enterprise environment, but I would
> prefer to use Django over how we do it now (JBoss and SQL, of course :).
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jon Brisibnhttp://jbrisbin.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to