I don't think its as simple as that. As I said, "no software I have will recognize them as valid images". This includes GIMP, Eye of Gnome, etc. All say that it is not a valid image or is corrupted.
Jay On Aug 20, 12:41 pm, Martin Diers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would suspect that #2 is a mime-type problem, which is just an S3 > property. Presuming the ImageField translates to a basic href into S3, > the mime-type property of the file would need to be set or else it is > going to come across as a Binary file. Some browsers are ok with this > non-standard behavior. Others are not, and will attempt to download > the file instead of display it. > > On Aug 20, 2008, at 10:56 AM, shadfc wrote: > > > > > With the code from the django-storages you referenced installed > > somewhere on PYTHONPATH, its as easy as setting a few things in your > > settings.py. You can see the docs for the code at > >http://code.larlet.fr/doc/django-s3-storage.html. Put the Required > > and Optional (if you want it, obviously) stuff in your settings.py and > > fill in the appropriate values for your S3 account. > > > Now, assuming those settings are all correct, all of your FileFields > > (and thus, ImageFields) should store to S3 into the bucket you set. > > You can continue to use upload_to to prefix the filename within the > > bucket. > > > Now, I've noticed a few bugs, both of which I've notified David (the > > author) of: > > 1) if you call object.filefield.size, this code will download the > > entire file from S3 just to calculate the size. This happens because > > of the construction of the _open() method on the S3Storage class. It > > should not make the S3 get call (which downloads the file). The > > workaround for now is not to use the size property with this code, but > > the more permanent fix is to delay reading of the file from S3 until > > read() is called on a S3StorageFile object. > > 2) I cannot get images to store correctly to S3 when using an > > ImageField. They appear in the bucket with a small filesize change, > > but no software I have will recognize them as valid images. Storing > > images (and any other file) via a FileField works just fine and the > > files are not corrupted. Strangely, storing images via ImageField on > > the FileSystemStorage backend works just fine, so it only seems to be > > the combination of an ImageField while using this S3 backend that is > > the problem. I am not sure where the bug in this is. If you give it > > a try, see if you can verify this bug for me. > > > Jay --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
