Thank you for the advise. I just started using Django and sometimes it takes time to get used to do certain things.
Regards, Arif On Nov 20, 3:40 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 15:18 -0800, ayayalar wrote: > > I understand, I wish it was possible to bind multiple view functions > > to a single template through the urls... > > Why? It's the wrong level of coupling. Each URL patterns ends up > resolving to a single view function. However that view function can (and > should if there's any great level of processing involved) call other > functions to do whatever it wants. So just move your multiple function > calls down one layer. It retains the "view per URL" pattern and you can > still have one function for each form. You just need to merge the > results at the end, but since that's just a dictionary update, it's one > line of code. > > You are trying to make this way too hard for yourself by getting hung up > on one particular pattern of usage that you guessed might be possible > without any supporting evidence. Since that isn't possible in Django and > isn't ever likely to be possible, it's particularly counter-productive > not to move on, especially as the way to do this is trivial. > > Regards, > Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
