Well, I'd like to write some docs first, but hey ,) I'm developing something on top of nose, to express my feelings, I call it django-sane-testing. Grab nose 0.10 and sane testing from http://devel.almad.net/trac/django-sane-testing/wiki/Releases and enjoy usual nose features (test selection, profiling plugin et al) together with:
* support for unit tests (yeah, no database handling when not needed - subclass from UnitTestCase) * selenium integration (subclass SeleniumTestCase and enjoy self.selenium) * live server (yup, you can use urllib2 now) * and hey, even TEST_RUNNER='djangosanetesting.testrunner.run_tests' works Well, docs and setuptools thinigies is what's left ;) Almad On Jan 22, 11:32 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote: > It's a little disappointing that there aren't a lot more people blogging > about using their test library of choice with Django. It's certainly > possible and would perhaps fill a gap in the accumulated knowledge-base. > Specifics of things that you (webchemist) find hard to emulate with your > favourite framework would obviously be useful to know about, probably in > a separate thread, but I think testing is an area where Django adopts a > nice unobtrusive behaviour and doesn't require any particular framework > for tests. > > Regards, > Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
