Tim Daniel schrieb:
> Thanks for making this clear!
> But do you think/know that this is the best way to do it? I haven't
> done it these way until now because in most cases it causes large and
> ugly urls(I only had to show the page number). Is the way I'm doing it
> till now a maybe ineficiente and thus not recommended way? I'm
> interested for that, because soon I'm going to deploy my django-app on
> a production server.
>
>
I am happy with this way. If your site gets much traffic, you can add
caching.
My approach (without data in the session) would be better for
caching, since all users share one cache:
example:
if the first user calls this:
http://.../myprojec/.../page_number=1&tag=abc
and a other user calls the same URL, you could use a cache
for the second request.
Thomas
--
Thomas Guettler, http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
E-Mail: guettli (*) thomas-guettler + de
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
