also sprach James Bennett <ubernost...@gmail.com> [2009.05.25.2047 +0200]: > And, really, this is the sort of thing that leads me to say it > shouldn't be in contrib right now. We do need to have some sort of > document outlining criteria, but I'd like to think that commitment to > a stable API (e.g., the author is willing to call it "1.0"), and to > support and updates are absolute requirements.
I completely agree, and it was a poor choice of example. After all, I started "using" Django three days ago, have never used django-tagging, but it /seemed/ a good example, since it /seemed/ to fit Jacob's criteria perfectly well. In the end, at the core of my question was the quest for a document outlining the criteria, which I think is an important asset for anyone evaluating Django. Thank you for getting me/us back on the ground wrt django-tagging. I'll take a look and since this is a core feature I am seeking, maybe I can put time into it. But how do we go about a document to specify what goes into contrib, beyond Jacob's three criteria? -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "da haben wir es also: eine kirchliche ordnung mit priesterschaft, theologie, kultus, sakrament; kurz, alles das, was jesus von nazareth bekämpft hatte..." - friedrich nietzsche spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
