On Jul 15, 4:19 pm, Emily Rodgers <emily.kate.rodg...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2:46 pm, "Richard E. Cooke" <rcooke1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > OK. Before I get flamed!
>
> > I neglected to search THIS group before I posted.
>
> > So, I see some chatter about being able to instansiate a second DB
> > connector. Great.
>
> > Now, how about where the best examples of that are?
>
> > And what impact, if any, does this have on the rest of Django?
>
> > My boss is starting to weaken too: "Maybe its not so bad having
> > Django tables added"....
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> I have been having a go at this lately [1], and what I posted seems to
> work to an extent, but I am currently having some m2m field problems
> (not problems with foreign keys though), so what I posted may be
> flawed.
>
> Alex G is working on getting proper support added to django for google
> summer of code 2009, so hopefully it will be in a future release of
> django :-)
>
> Em
>
> [1]http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/af3a...
I have figured out why the m2m field problems were happening (although
not fixed it elegantly yet). When I figure out how to prevent the
problem, I will reply to the other thread (where my suggested
workaround it).
Em
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
