Thanks, I'll take a look at those. It also looks I was wrong about
'pysqlite2' not being a replacement for 'sqlite3' in Py2.5 - it looks
like they are the same but pysqlite2 is arranged a bit differently, so
the same import doesn't work; but it seems an adapter can be made so
that 'import sqlite3' will work. So that could be the easiest.

For the record, the adapter is this file 'sqlite3.py' in site-
packages:

----
from pysqlite2 import dbapi2
from pysqlite2.dbapi2 import *
-----

(haven't tried this against django yet. Comparing dbapi2.py against
the one in py2.5 I also see what looks like a bugfix related to
microseconds in datetime conversions).


On Jan 20, 8:41 pm, Chris Lee-Messer <chris.leemes...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes, it is possible to serve django via cgi
>
> seehttp://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/ServerArrangements
>
> However, I would think that you would be better off one of several
> alternatives that use a second server to run django persistently.
>
> As one example,  If you can use mod_rewrite on apache, you could proxy
> to cherrypy's wsgi server.  
> Seehttp://lincolnloop.com/blog/2008/mar/25/serving-django-cherrypy/
>
> for an example and code for django_cpserver.
>
> -C
>
> On Jan 20, 1:28 pm, gs_toronto <gsm...@alumni.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>
> > I have this apache installation which has mod_python, but that's bound
> > to an existing python2.3 installation (which is in use for other web
> > app, that uses compiled python extensions which won't work with
> > py2.5). python2.3 doesn't have sqlite3 module (and 'pysqlite2' add-on
> > isn't the same).
>
> > So, I can't use mod_python, and the apache server has been set up
> > without mod_wsgi or mod_fastsgi.
>
> > I can create executable files with '#!/usr/local/bin/python' as the
> > first line, and describe these as CGI scripts to apache. However, I
> > can find nothing in the django docs to describe how django can be run
> > this way. Isn't it possible to set up django apps using 'plain CGI'?
> > It's ok if it's not that efficient. Much better than 'impossible'.
>
> > Failing that, it seems to me it should be possible to add the sqlite3
> > library to python2.3, has anyone been able to do that?
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.


Reply via email to