On 6/25/25 2:33 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h index 3d1577f07c1c..930daff207df 100644 --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h @@ -350,11 +350,11 @@ enum req_op { /* Close a zone */ REQ_OP_ZONE_CLOSE = (__force blk_opf_t)11, /* Transition a zone to full */ - REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH = (__force blk_opf_t)12, + REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH = (__force blk_opf_t)13, /* reset a zone write pointer */ - REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET = (__force blk_opf_t)13, + REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET = (__force blk_opf_t)15, /* reset all the zone present on the device */ - REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL = (__force blk_opf_t)15, + REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL = (__force blk_opf_t)17,/* Driver private requests */REQ_OP_DRV_IN = (__force blk_opf_t)34,
Since we are renumbering operation types, how about also renumbering REQ_OP_ZONE_OPEN and/or REQ_OP_ZONE_CLOSE? Neither operation modifies data on the storage medium nor any write pointers so these operations shouldn't be considered as write operations, isn't it? Thanks, Bart.
