在 2025/10/22 17:20, Greg KH 写道:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 05:10:36PM +0800, Li Lingfeng wrote:
在 2025/10/22 16:45, Greg KH 写道:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 04:21:33PM +0800, Li Lingfeng wrote:
Hi,
在 2025/10/22 16:10, Greg KH 写道:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 04:01:04PM +0800, Li Lingfeng wrote:
Hi,
在 2025/10/14 11:03, Sasha Levin 写道:
From: Zheng Qixing <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit 8d33a030c566e1f105cd5bf27f37940b6367f3be ]
There is a race condition between dm device suspend and table load that
can lead to null pointer dereference. The issue occurs when suspend is
invoked before table load completes:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000054
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 6 PID: 6798 Comm: dmsetup Not tainted 6.6.0-g7e52f5f0ca9b #62
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37
04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:blk_mq_wait_quiesce_done+0x0/0x50
Call Trace:
<TASK>
blk_mq_quiesce_queue+0x2c/0x50
dm_stop_queue+0xd/0x20
__dm_suspend+0x130/0x330
dm_suspend+0x11a/0x180
dev_suspend+0x27e/0x560
ctl_ioctl+0x4cf/0x850
dm_ctl_ioctl+0xd/0x20
vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x50
__se_sys_ioctl+0x9b/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x19/0x30
x64_sys_call+0x2c4a/0x4620
do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x1b0
The issue can be triggered as below:
T1 T2
dm_suspend table_load
__dm_suspend dm_setup_md_queue
dm_mq_init_request_queue
blk_mq_init_allocated_queue
=> q->mq_ops = set->ops; (1)
dm_stop_queue / dm_wait_for_completion
=> q->tag_set NULL pointer! (2)
=> q->tag_set = set; (3)
Fix this by checking if a valid table (map) exists before performing
request-based suspend and waiting for target I/O. When map is NULL,
skip these table-dependent suspend steps.
Even when map is NULL, no I/O can reach any target because there is
no table loaded; I/O submitted in this state will fail early in the
DM layer. Skipping the table-dependent suspend logic in this case
is safe and avoids NULL pointer dereferences.
Fixes: c4576aed8d85 ("dm: fix request-based dm's use of dm_wait_for_completion")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Zheng Qixing <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
[ omitted DMF_QUEUE_STOPPED flag setting and braces absent in 5.15 ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/md/dm.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index 0868358a7a8d2..b51281ce15d4c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -2457,7 +2457,7 @@ static int __dm_suspend(struct mapped_device *md, struct
dm_table *map,
{
bool do_lockfs = suspend_flags & DM_SUSPEND_LOCKFS_FLAG;
bool noflush = suspend_flags & DM_SUSPEND_NOFLUSH_FLAG;
- int r;
+ int r = 0;
lockdep_assert_held(&md->suspend_lock);
@@ -2509,7 +2509,7 @@ static int __dm_suspend(struct mapped_device *md, struct
dm_table *map,
* Stop md->queue before flushing md->wq in case request-based
* dm defers requests to md->wq from md->queue.
*/
- if (dm_request_based(md))
+ if (map && dm_request_based(md))
dm_stop_queue(md->queue);
It seems that before commit 80bd4a7aab4c ("blk-mq: move the srcu_struct
used for quiescing to the tagset") was merged, blk_mq_wait_quiesce_done()
would not attempt to access q->tag_set, so in dm_stop_queue() this kind
of race condition would not cause a null pointer dereference. The change
may not be necessary for 5.10, but adding it doesn’t appear to cause any
issues either.
flush_workqueue(md->wq);
@@ -2519,7 +2519,8 @@ static int __dm_suspend(struct mapped_device *md, struct
dm_table *map,
* We call dm_wait_for_completion to wait for all existing requests
* to finish.
*/
- r = dm_wait_for_completion(md, task_state);
+ if (map)
+ r = dm_wait_for_completion(md, task_state);
The fix tag c4576aed8d85 ("dm: fix request-based dm's use of
dm_wait_for_completion") seems to correspond to the modification of
dm_wait_for_completion().
if (!r)
set_bit(dmf_suspended_flag, &md->flags);
Perhaps adding another fix tag would be more appropriate?
Those tags come directly from the original commit.
Thanks for the clarification. Since the patch has already been merged into
the mainline tree, we can't update the commit there. I was just wondering
if it would be acceptable to add an additional “Fixes” tag when applying
it to the stable branch, before merging.
I can, if needed, can you please provide that line?
Fixes: 80bd4a7aab4c ("blk-mq: move the srcu_struct used for quiescing to the
tagset")
This is odd, that is a 6.2 commit, yet this is being asked to be added
to 5.10.y. So what help is this going to provide?
confused,
greg k-h
Apologies, I didn't notice the version of this patch. Indeed, this patch
was not included in 5.10, and 5.10 is not affected by this issue. Perhaps
we could add the new fix tag to the stable branch patches starting from
6.2?
Thanks,
Lingfeng
