On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 12:49:53PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > I accepted both patches. > > Just nit-picking - I prefer type name as an argument to the sizeof > operator rather than variable name - because when someone needs to find > out where variables with a particular type are allocated, it can be easily > done with grep if the sizeof operator contains the type name. So I changed > your patches so that there are type names.
Thanks for the fix-ups! I wanted to check on these patches, though, since I still don't see them in -next and the merge window is expected to open next week. Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook
