On Thu, 2026-06-18 at 15:47 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 6/17/26 12:13 AM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 02:29:01PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> 
> > > +Choose the path for the next I/O request by \fBcycling through
> > > the path groups\fR.
> > 
> > This isn't a strong objections, but personally, I'm not sure
> > "groups"
> > makes this better. It kind of sounds like paths are picked from
> > multiple
> > path groups. Perhaps:
> > "cycling through the paths"
> > or
> > "cycling through the paths in the path group"
> > 
> > I'm also o.k. with leaving it as you have it.
> You are absolutely right. Using the plural "groups" breaks the
> coherence
> of the sentence because I/O is cycled within the active path group,
> not between different groups.
> 
> I'll restore the singular form in v3. Thanks

Right, my bad, sorry.

Reply via email to