Branch 2016-02-10-thin-dev-on-4.4 https://github.com/jthornber/linux-2.6/commit/9b0d197c86371bc4de01dcb7d7b1a49664d5d15e https://github.com/jthornber/linux-2.6/commit/04a082129113de7c495eb609cdfcbbedc6cab3a3
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 at 22:03 Mike Snitzer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11 2016 at 5:41am -0500, > Joe Thornber <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:13:05PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > Shouldn't get_policy()'s call to get_policy_once() resolve "mq" to be > > > "smq" if we just add this to the bottom of dm-cache-policy-smq?: > > > > > > MODULE_ALIAS("dm-cache-mq"); > > > > Yes, you're right. See my fixup patch. > > Hmm, not seeing what you consider to be the latest fixed up version.. > (nothing that sets: MODULE_ALIAS("dm-cache-mq") in smq.c) > > But I've staged this in linux-next for 4.6, see: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=8cbd0cb8cca67baa3e430fb6d636613fdc1cee1a >
-- dm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
