On Wed, Sep 28 2016 at 11:34am -0400, SF Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:25:17 +0200 > > Some update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (10): > Use kcalloc() in crypt_alloc_tfms() > Reduce the scope for a variable in crypt_alloc_tfms() > Rename a jump label in crypt_message() > Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in crypt_message() > Rename a jump label in crypt_set_key() > Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in crypt_set_key() > Rename a jump label in crypt_iv_tcw_whitening() > Return directly after a failed crypto_alloc_ahash() in crypt_iv_essiv_ctr() > Two checks and one function call less in crypt_iv_essiv_ctr() after error > detection > Delete unnecessary variable initialisations in crypt_iv_essiv_ctr() > > drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 51 > ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) These are _not_ the kind of changes I want to be seeing. Churn in the name of "fine-tuning". Nack. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
