dm-bufio checks a watermark when it allocates a new buffer in the function
__bufio_new. However, it doesn't check the watermark when the user changes
the value /sys/module/dm_bufio/parameters/max_cache_size_bytes.

This may result in a problem - if the watermark is high enough so that all
possible buffers are allocated and if the user lowers the value
"max_cache_size_bytes", the watermark will never be checked against the
new value because no new buffer would be allocated.

This patch changes the function __evict_old_buffers so that it checks the
watermark. __evict_old_buffers is called every 30 seconds, so if the user
lowes "max_cache_size_bytes", dm-bufio will react to this change within
30 seconds and decrease memory consumption.

This patch requires the previous patch "dm-bufio: avoid a possible
deadlock due to lock ordering" to be applied. Applying this patch without
the previous patch would result in a deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]

---
 drivers/md/dm-bufio.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -1835,9 +1835,17 @@ static void __evict_old_buffers(struct d
        struct dm_buffer *b, *tmp;
        unsigned retain_target = get_retain_buffers(c);
        unsigned count;
+       LIST_HEAD(write_list);
 
        dm_bufio_lock(c);
 
+       __check_watermark(c, &write_list);
+       if (unlikely(!list_empty(&write_list))) {
+               dm_bufio_unlock(c);
+               __flush_write_list(&write_list);
+               dm_bufio_lock(c);
+       }
+
        count = c->n_buffers[LIST_CLEAN] + c->n_buffers[LIST_DIRTY];
        list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(b, tmp, &c->lru[LIST_CLEAN], lru_list) 
{
                if (count <= retain_target)
@@ -1862,6 +1870,8 @@ static void cleanup_old_buffers(void)
 
        mutex_lock(&dm_bufio_clients_lock);
 
+       __cache_size_refresh();
+
        list_for_each_entry(c, &dm_bufio_all_clients, client_list)
                __evict_old_buffers(c, max_age_hz);
 

--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to