On Mon, Sep 17 2018 at 10:51am -0400,
Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/17/18 7:20 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >>- Avoid that m->hw_handler_name becomes a dangling pointer if the
> >> RETAIN_ATTACHED_HW_HANDLER flag is set and scsi_dh_attach() returns
> >> -EBUSY.
> >
> >What is the concern about a dangling pointer? How does that manifest?
> >Stale scsi_dh name stored in hw_handler_name? Pretty sure it gets freed
> >and reassigned as needed (at the start of setup_scsi_dh).
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> Thanks for having taken a look. Before commit e8f74a0f0011, if both
> MPATHF_RETAIN_ATTACHED_HW_HANDLER and m->hw_handler_name are set
> before setup_scsi_dh() is called and if scsi_dh_attach() returns
> -EBUSY, scsi_dh_attached_handler_name() was called twice and
> allocated memory twice for the handler name. Since commit
> e8f74a0f0011, in that scenario, the following code related to the
> handler name is executed:
>
> kfree(m->hw_handler_name);
> m->hw_handler_name = attached_handler_name;
> [ scsi_dh_attach() returns -EBUSY ]
> kfree(m->hw_handler_name);
> m->hw_handler_name = attached_handler_name;
>
> I think this sequence makes m->hw_handler_name a dangling pointer.
Ah I see. My patch happened to fix that up by resetting
attached_handler_name to NULL and also checking it for NULL during 'goto
retain'.
> >diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> >index d94ba6f72ff5..688ac9e719a7 100644
> >--- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> >+++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> >@@ -806,14 +806,14 @@ static int parse_path_selector(struct dm_arg_set *as,
> >struct priority_group *pg,
> > }
> > static int setup_scsi_dh(struct block_device *bdev, struct multipath *m,
> >- const char *attached_handler_name, char **error)
> >+ char **attached_handler_name, char **error)
> > {
> > struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> > int r;
> > if (test_bit(MPATHF_RETAIN_ATTACHED_HW_HANDLER, &m->flags)) {
> > retain:
> >- if (attached_handler_name) {
> >+ if (*attached_handler_name) {
> > /*
> > * Clear any hw_handler_params associated with a
> > * handler that isn't already attached.
> >@@ -830,7 +830,8 @@ static int setup_scsi_dh(struct block_device *bdev,
> >struct multipath *m,
> > * handler instead of the original table passed in.
> > */
> > kfree(m->hw_handler_name);
> >- m->hw_handler_name = attached_handler_name;
> >+ m->hw_handler_name = *attached_handler_name;
> >+ *attached_handler_name = NULL;
> > }
> > }
> >@@ -867,7 +868,7 @@ static struct pgpath *parse_path(struct dm_arg_set *as,
> >struct path_selector *ps
> > struct pgpath *p;
> > struct multipath *m = ti->private;
> > struct request_queue *q;
> >- const char *attached_handler_name;
> >+ char *attached_handler_name = NULL;
> > /* we need at least a path arg */
> > if (as->argc < 1) {
> >@@ -890,7 +891,7 @@ static struct pgpath *parse_path(struct dm_arg_set *as,
> >struct path_selector *ps
> > attached_handler_name = scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(q, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (attached_handler_name || m->hw_handler_name) {
> > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&p->activate_path, activate_path_work);
> >- r = setup_scsi_dh(p->path.dev->bdev, m, attached_handler_name,
> >&ti->error);
> >+ r = setup_scsi_dh(p->path.dev->bdev, m, &attached_handler_name,
> >&ti->error);
> > if (r) {
> > dm_put_device(ti, p->path.dev);
> > goto bad;
> >@@ -905,6 +906,8 @@ static struct pgpath *parse_path(struct dm_arg_set *as,
> >struct path_selector *ps
> > return p;
> > bad:
> >+ if (attached_handler_name)
> >+ kfree(attached_handler_name);
> > free_pgpath(p);
> > return ERR_PTR(r);
> > }
>
> Except that the if (attached_handler_name) should be removed from
> before the kfree() call, the above looks good to me.
Yeah, sure, since kfree() checks for NULL.
> But since we can avoid changing the type of attached_handler_name from
> char * into char ** by moving the kfree() call into setup_scsi_dh(), I
> prefer to avoid to make that change.
Moving kfree() into setup_scsi_dh() would require use of a common goto
for cleanup (something parse_path() already has with 'goto bad;').
But having kfree() in parse_path() is cleaner/symmetric since call to
scsi_dh_attached_handler_name() -- and associated memory allocation --
occurs in parse_path().
If you're OK with this, I'll get a proper patch staged based on your
header and obviously add a Reported-by attributed to you.
Thanks,
Mike
--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
