> diff --git a/block/blk-zoned.c b/block/blk-zoned.c
> index 4bc5f260248a..293891b7068a 100644
> --- a/block/blk-zoned.c
> +++ b/block/blk-zoned.c
> @@ -441,6 +441,57 @@ void blk_queue_free_zone_bitmaps(struct request_queue *q)
>       q->seq_zones_wlock = NULL;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * blk_check_zone - Check a zone information
> + * @q:               request queue
> + * @zone:    the zone to  check
> + * @sector:  start sector of the zone
> + *
> + * Helper function to check zones of a zoned block device. Returns true if 
> the
> + * zone is correct and false if a problem is detected.
> + */
> +static bool blk_check_zone(struct gendisk *disk, struct blk_zone *zone,
> +                        sector_t *sector)

Maybe call this blk_zone_valid?  Also in many places we don't really
do the verbose kerneldoc comments with the duplicated parameter names
for local functions, as the scripts only pick up non-stack ones anyway.

> +     /*
> +      * All zones must have the same size, with the exception on an eventual
> +      * smaller last zone.
> +      */
> +     if (zone->start + zone_sectors < capacity &&
> +         zone->len != zone_sectors) {
> +             pr_warn("%s: Invalid zone device with non constant zone size\n",
> +                     disk->disk_name);
> +             return false;
> +     }

I think we should also move the power of two zone size check here
instead of leaving it in the driver.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to