On 4/29/20 6:30 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
Hi

This is the clflushopt patch for the next merge window.

Mikulas


From: Mikulas Patocka <mpato...@redhat.com>

When testing the dm-writecache target on a real Optane-based persistent
memory, it turned out that explicit cache flushing using the clflushopt
instruction performs better than non-temporal stores for block sizes 1k,
2k and 4k.

This patch adds a new function memcpy_flushcache_optimized that tests if
clflushopt is present - and if it is, we use it instead of
memcpy_flushcache.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpato...@redhat.com>

---
  drivers/md/dm-writecache.c |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c   2020-04-29 18:09:53.599999000 
+0200
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c        2020-04-29 18:22:36.139999000 
+0200
@@ -1137,6 +1137,33 @@ static int writecache_message(struct dm_
        return r;
  }
+static void memcpy_flushcache_optimized(void *dest, void *source, size_t size)
+{
+       /*
+        * clufhsopt performs better with block size 1024, 2048, 4096


Typo:       ^clflushopt

Heinz


+        * non-temporal stores perform better with block size 512
+        *
+        * block size   512             1024            2048            4096
+        * movnti       496 MB/s        642 MB/s        725 MB/s        744 MB/s
+        * clflushopt   373 MB/s        688 MB/s        1.1 GB/s        1.2 GB/s
+        */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+       if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSHOPT) &&
+           likely(boot_cpu_data.x86_clflush_size == 64) &&
+           likely(size >= 768)) {
+               do {
+                       memcpy((void *)dest, (void *)source, 64);
+                       clflushopt((void *)dest);
+                       dest += 64;
+                       source += 64;
+                       size -= 64;
+               } while (size >= 64);
+               return;
+       }
+#endif
+       memcpy_flushcache(dest, source, size);
+}
+
  static void bio_copy_block(struct dm_writecache *wc, struct bio *bio, void 
*data)
  {
        void *buf;
@@ -1162,7 +1189,7 @@ static void bio_copy_block(struct dm_wri
                        }
                } else {
                        flush_dcache_page(bio_page(bio));
-                       memcpy_flushcache(data, buf, size);
+                       memcpy_flushcache_optimized(data, buf, size);
                }
bvec_kunmap_irq(buf, &flags);

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to