On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 09:15:39PM +0000, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 16:15 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > The multipathd tur checker thread is designed to be able to finish at
> > any time, even after the tur checker itself has been freed. The
> > multipathd shutdown code makes sure all the checkers have been freed
> > before freeing the checker_class and calling dlclose() to unload the
> > DSO, but this doesn't guarantee that the checker threads have
> > finished.
> > If one hasn't, the DSO will get unloaded while the thread still
> > running
> > code from it, causing a segfault. Unfortunately, it's not possible to
> > be
> > sure that all tur checker threads have ended during shutdown, without
> > making them joinable.
> > 
> > However, since libmultipath will never be reinitialized after it has
> > been uninitialzed, not dlclosing the tur checker DSO once a thread is
> > started has minimal cost (keeping the DSO code around until the
> > program
> > exits, which usually happens right after freeing the checkers).
> 
> I'm not against this, but have you considered using an atomic  refcount
> for the DSO? With every tur thread starting, we could increase it, and
> decrease it in the cleanup function of the thread when it exits. That
> should be safe. If the refcount was positive when we exit, we could
> refrain from unloading the DSO.
> 
> Regards,
> Martin

NAK. I apparently forgot to commit the version file changes.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to