On 11/18/20 8:35 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 18.11.20 17:07, Mike Snitzer wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18 2020 at 10:49am -0500, >> Mike Snitzer <snit...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> I don't think my suggestion will help.. given it'd still leave >>> persistent_memory_claim() without a return statement. >>> >>> Think it worthwhile to just add a dummy 'return 0;' after the BUG(). >> >> Decided to go with this, now staged for 5.11: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-5.11&id=a1e4865b4dda7071f3707f7e551289ead66e38b1 >> > > Looks like a sane solution. Thank you for following up.
Yes, thanks again. -- ~Randy -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
