On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 08:19:17PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> +static inline void blk_create_io_context(struct request_queue *q)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Various block parts want %current->io_context, so allocate it up
> + * front rather than dealing with lots of pain to allocate it only
> + * where needed. This may fail and the block layer knows how to live
> + * with it.
> + */
I think this comment would make more sense if it were placed above the
caller rather than within this function.
> + if (unlikely(!current->io_context))
> + create_task_io_context(current, GFP_ATOMIC, q->node);
> +}
> +
> static noinline_for_stack bool submit_bio_checks(struct bio *bio)
> {
> struct block_device *bdev = bio->bi_bdev;
> @@ -836,6 +848,8 @@ static noinline_for_stack bool submit_bio_checks(struct
> bio *bio)
> }
> }
>
> + blk_create_io_context(q);
> +
> if (!blk_queue_poll(q))
> bio->bi_opf &= ~REQ_HIPRI;
>
> @@ -876,15 +890,6 @@ static noinline_for_stack bool submit_bio_checks(struct
> bio *bio)
> break;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Various block parts want %current->io_context, so allocate it up
> - * front rather than dealing with lots of pain to allocate it only
> - * where needed. This may fail and the block layer knows how to live
> - * with it.
> - */
> - if (unlikely(!current->io_context))
> - create_task_io_context(current, GFP_ATOMIC, q->node);
> -
> if (blk_throtl_bio(bio)) {
> blkcg_bio_issue_init(bio);
> return false;
> --
> 2.29.2
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
