On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 11:29 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > When ev_remove_path() returned success, callers assumed that the path > (and possibly the map) had been removed. When ev_remove_path() > returned > failure, callers assumed that the path had not been removed. However, > the path could be removed on both success or failure. This could cause > callers to dereference the path after it was removed. > > To deal with this, make ev_remove_path() return a different symbolic > value for each outcome, and make the callers react appropriately for > the different values. Found by coverity. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarz...@redhat.com>+
Reviewed-by: Martin Wilck <mwi...@suse.com> -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
