On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 11:57:29AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 11:42:27AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > So more likely is that this patch just helps unmask a real issue
> > elsewhere -- linker, compiler, or register restoration after preemption.
> > I don't think there's anything to do with regards to the patch of this
> > thread, as it's clearly fine. 
> 
> The problem even goes away if I just add a nop...

Alignment? Compiler bug? HW issue?

> diff --git a/lib/hexdump.c b/lib/hexdump.c
> index 06833d404398..ace74f9b3d5a 100644
> --- a/lib/hexdump.c
> +++ b/lib/hexdump.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hex_asc_upper);
>  int hex_to_bin(unsigned char ch)
>  {
>       unsigned char cu = ch & 0xdf;
> +     __asm__("l.nop 0");
>       return -1 +
>               ((ch - '0' +  1) & (unsigned)((ch - '9' - 1) & ('0' - 1 - ch)) 
> >> 8) +
>               ((cu - 'A' + 11) & (unsigned)((cu - 'F' - 1) & ('A' - 1 - cu)) 
> >> 8);
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to