On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 3:02 PM Mike Snitzer <snit...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Also Joe, for you proposed dm-thinp design where you distinquish > between "provision" and "reserve": Would it make sense for REQ_META > (e.g. all XFS metadata) with REQ_PROVISION to be treated as an > LBA-specific hard request? Whereas REQ_PROVISION on its own provides > more freedom to just reserve the length of blocks? (e.g. for XFS > delalloc where LBA range is unknown, but dm-thinp can be asked to > reserve space to accomodate it). > My proposal only involves 'reserve'. Provisioning will be done as part of the usual io path. - Joe
-- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
