Hi,
在 2023/06/14 9:48, Yu Kuai 写道:
In the patch, sync_seq is added in md_reap_sync_thread. In
idle_sync_thread, if sync_seq isn't equal
mddev->sync_seq, it should mean there is someone that stops the sync
thread already, right? Why do
you say 'new started sync thread' here?
If someone stops the sync thread, and new sync thread is not started,
then this sync_seq won't make a difference, above wait_event() will not
wait because !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery) will pass.
So 'sync_seq' is only used when the old sync thread stops and new sync
thread starts, add 'sync_seq' will bypass this case.
Thanks,
Kuai
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
