dmarc-discuss
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Messages by Thread
[dmarc-discuss] De-munging From:, would this list participate?
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Duplicate reports from Google
Sahbi via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] What bad stuff can a broken DMARC record cause?
John R Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] What bad stuff can a broken DMARC record cause?
Ángel via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] DMARC Aggregate Reports
John Dutfield via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC Aggregate Reports
Ahsan Khan via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC Aggregate Reports
John Dutfield via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC Aggregate Reports
Matthäus Wander via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Some DMARC adoption data
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Some DMARC adoption data
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Some DMARC adoption data
Ahsan Khan via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] [Ext] Re: Some DMARC adoption data
Chris Sweeney via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] [Ext] Re: Some DMARC adoption data
John R Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] [Ext] RE: [Ext] Re: Some DMARC adoption data
Chris Sweeney via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] [Ext] RE: [Ext] Re: Some DMARC adoption data
John R Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] [Ext] Re: [Ext] RE: [Ext] Re: Some DMARC adoption data
Chris Sweeney via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] [Ext] Re: [Ext] RE: [Ext] Re: Some DMARC adoption data
John R Levine via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Why is this dmarc report from google all garbled?
Sean Malloy via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why is this dmarc report from google all garbled?
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Heterogeneity in handling non-OD inputs among web-based DMARC checking tools
su...@banbreach.com via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Heterogeneity in handling non-OD inputs among web-based DMARC checking tools
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Heterogeneity in handling non-OD inputs among web-based DMARC checking tools
su...@banbreach.com via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Heterogeneity in handling non-OD inputs among web-based DMARC checking tools
Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Heterogeneity in handling non-OD inputs among web-based DMARC checking tools
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Heterogeneity in handling non-OD inputs among web-based DMARC checking tools
su...@banbreach.com via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Heterogeneity in handling non-OD inputs among web-based DMARC checking tools
John R Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Heterogeneity in handling non-OD inputs among web-based DMARC checking tools
su...@banbreach.com via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Heterogeneity in handling non-OD inputs among web-based DMARC checking tools
Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Heterogeneity in handling non-OD inputs among web-based DMARC checking tools
su...@banbreach.com via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Use of <policy_published><domain> in DMARC aggregate reports
Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Use of <policy_published><domain> in DMARC aggregate reports
Matthäus Wander via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Use of <policy_published><domain> in DMARC aggregate reports
Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Use of <policy_published><domain> in DMARC aggregate reports
Jonathan Kamens via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Drop or No Google DMARC reports
Ivan Kovachev via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Drop or No Google DMARC reports
Matthäus Wander via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] opendmarc and response from Mailer Daemon
Kazik K. via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc and response from Mailer Daemon
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc and response from Mailer Daemon
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Multiple copies of single DMARC report from Google
Douglas Fraser via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Multiple copies of single DMARC report from Google
Matthäus Wander via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Alexander NAZARIAN via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Matthäus Wander via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Alexander NAZARIAN via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Jonathan Kamens via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Streamsend/campaigner.com causing dmarc mismatch error
Ian Evans via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Streamsend/campaigner.com causing dmarc mismatch error
Kurt Andersen (DMARC) via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Yahoo reporting results
Ivan Kovachev via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] If my understanding is correct?
Blason R via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] If my understanding is correct?
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] If my understanding is correct?
Blason R via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] If my understanding is correct?
Zack Aab via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Need documents to achieve DMARC alignment
Blason R via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Need documents to achieve DMARC alignment
Faisal Misle via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Need documents to achieve DMARC alignment
Blason R via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Need documents to achieve DMARC alignment
Dotzero via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Need documents to achieve DMARC alignment
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Intra-Google DMARC Reports
Faisal Misle via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] postfix opendmarc reporting tool needed
TSHIMANGA Minkoka via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] postfix opendmarc reporting tool needed
Miroslav Geisselreiter via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] postfix opendmarc reporting tool needed
A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] postfix opendmarc reporting tool needed
TSHIMANGA Minkoka via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Thoughts for new value 'p=nomail'
Matt Vernhout via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Thoughts for new value 'p=nomail'
Dotzero via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Thoughts for new value 'p=nomail'
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Thoughts for new value 'p=nomail'
Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Thoughts for new value 'p=nomail'
John R Levine via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Hotmail DMARC record issue
Randal Pinto via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Hotmail DMARC record issue
Bressier Simon via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Speaking of mail security
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Speaking of mail security
Claus Assmann via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Speaking of mail security
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass for unauthorized servers?
Paul M. Beck via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass for unauthorized servers?
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass for unauthorized servers?
Matthäus Wander via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass for unauthorized servers?
Dave Crocker via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass for unauthorized servers?
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass for unauthorized servers?
Dave Crocker via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass for unauthorized servers?
Paul M. Beck via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass for unauthorized servers?
John R Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass for unauthorized servers?
Paul M. Beck via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass for unauthorized servers?
Matthäus Wander via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass for unauthorized servers?
Dotzero via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Problems with settings DMARC
Figo Morales via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Problems with settings DMARC
Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Problems with settings DMARC
Matt Anton via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] SPF and DKIM
Roshan Hiripitiyage via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF and DKIM
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF and DKIM
Roshan Hiripitiyage via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF and DKIM
Paul Smith via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF and DKIM
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF and DKIM
Roshan Hiripitiyage via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Ranked domains that advertise RUA addresses and then bounce aggregate reports sent to them
Jonathan Kamens via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Ranked domains that advertise RUA addresses and then bounce aggregate reports sent to them
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Ranked domains that advertise RUA addresses and then bounce aggregate reports sent to them
Jonathan Kamens via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Ranked domains that advertise RUA addresses and then bounce aggregate reports sent to them
Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] DMARC vs DKIM keys with s=mtasts
John R Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC vs DKIM keys with s=mtasts
Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC vs DKIM keys with s=mtasts
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC vs DKIM keys with s=mtasts
Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC vs DKIM keys with s=mtasts
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC vs DKIM keys with s=mtasts
Marc Bradshaw via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC vs DKIM keys with s=mtasts
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC vs DKIM keys with s=mtasts
Marc Bradshaw via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] DMARC is not disabled automatically at Office 365 when the MX is different
Ivan Kovachev via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC is not disabled automatically at Office 365 when the MX is different
Ivan Kovachev via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC is not disabled automatically at Office 365 when the MX is different
Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC is not disabled automatically at Office 365 when the MX is different
Dave Crocker via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC is not disabled automatically at Office 365 when the MX is different
Kurt Andersen (DMARC) via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC is not disabled automatically at Office 365 when the MX is different
Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC is not disabled automatically at Office 365 when the MX is different
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC is not disabled automatically at Office 365 when the MX is different
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] DMARC and SPF Failures
Marisa Clardy via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and SPF Failures
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and SPF Failures
Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Slightly OT: New ARC logo to celebrate RFC8617
Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Basic questions
Justina Colmena via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Basic questions
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] PolicyOverride in Reporting
Brotman, Alex via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] PolicyOverride in Reporting
Dotzero via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] PolicyOverride in Reporting
Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] PolicyOverride in Reporting
Dotzero via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] PolicyPublished, was PolicyOverride in Reporting
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] PolicyPublished, was PolicyOverride in Reporting
Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] PolicyPublished, was PolicyOverride in Reporting
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] PolicyPublished, was PolicyOverride in Reporting
Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: PolicyOverride in Reporting
Brotman, Alex via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: PolicyOverride in Reporting
Seth Blank via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Having trouble getting DKIM to pass
kshgc via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Testing DMARC
Gerben Wierda via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Testing DMARC
Ken O'Driscoll via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Testing DMARC
Gerben Wierda via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Testing DMARC
Patrick Peterson via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Testing DMARC
Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Testing DMARC
Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Testing DMARC
Patrick Peterson via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Testing DMARC
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Know anyone working on ARC at Microsoft ?
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Know anyone working on ARC at Microsoft ?
Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Know anyone working on ARC at Microsoft ?
Seth Blank via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Know anyone working on ARC at Microsoft ?
Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Know anyone working on ARC at Microsoft ?
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Know anyone working on ARC at Microsoft ?
Seth Blank via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] SPF Macros
Ivan Kovachev via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF Macros
Seth Blank via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF Macros
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF Macros
Bressier Simon via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] DMARC forensic reports
Ivan Kovachev via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC forensic reports
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Re-verifying external report destinations
Ken O'Driscoll via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Re-verifying external report destinations
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Re-verifying external report destinations
Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Re-verifying external report destinations
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Re-verifying external report destinations
Michael via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] FYA: Class action administrators send out millions of emails that violate DMARC and are rejected
Jonathan Kamens via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] DMARC fails for "on behalf of" messages
Jay 1985 via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC fails for "on behalf of" messages
Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC fails for "on behalf of" messages
Jay 1985 via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC fails for "on behalf of" messages
Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC fails for "on behalf of" messages
Alexander from EasyDMARC via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC fails for "on behalf of" messages
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] DMARC RUF
Jose Campos via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC RUF
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC RUF
Jose Campos via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC RUF
Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC RUF
John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 85, Issue 2 UNSUBSCRIBE PLEASE
Lorraine Edel via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 85, Issue 2 UNSUBSCRIBE PLEASE
Ken O'Driscoll via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] dmarc Newbie
Wojtowicz, Andrew via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc Newbie
Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc Newbie
lists--- via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc Newbie
lists--- via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc Newbie
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc Newbie
Paul Smith via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc Newbie
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Gmail making email more secure with MTA-STS standard
Denis Salicetti via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] newbie question about Source-IP
Patrick Proniewski via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] newbie question about Source-IP
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] newbie question about Source-IP
Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] newbie question about Source-IP
Patrick Proniewski via dmarc-discuss
[dmarc-discuss] Inbound spoofed mails
Blason R via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Inbound spoofed mails
Edward Siewick via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Inbound spoofed mails
Blason R via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Inbound spoofed mails
Edward Siewick via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Inbound spoofed mails
Pete Holzmann via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Inbound spoofed mails
Blason R via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Inbound spoofed mails
Dotzero via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Inbound spoofed mails
Blason R via dmarc-discuss
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Inbound spoofed mails
Dotzero via dmarc-discuss
Earlier messages