>Suggest following this thread from 2007. >http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2007q2/007663.html
That's the null MX proposal. I resuscitated Mark Delany's draft in July, and I suppose I might nudge Murray to see if appsawg would accept it, but it's a separate issue. For DMARC, what advice can we offer beyond publishing SPF -al and DKIM p=reject? (Normally I'm not a big fan of p=reject, but this is a place where it's clearly appropriate.) R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
