>Does anyone who's implemented "fo" have a problem with both "0" and "1" >being specified? If it is somehow problematic, then the base spec ought >to say so.
I don't understand what fo=1 is supposed to mean. If there's no SPF record at all, are you supposed to generate a report? If there's no DKIM signature at all, same question? Of if there are DKIM signatures, but none of them have a d= that matches the From: address? R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
