In article 
<db5pr02mb10308a1c558341a481ec5f2ce6...@db5pr02mb1030.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 you write:
>Yes, the slash is mandatory. From RFC 2045 5.1:

More to the point, the media type is application/gzip, not anything else.

See RFC 6713 which I wrote specifically so DMARC reports could use
gzip, which can be read directly out of the message, rather than zip
which you have to store in a file because the table of contents is at
the end.

R's,
John

PS: I see a bunch of reports from Comcast in 2013, then three in
September with the bogus application-x-gzip. and nothing since then.


>
>
>     content := "Content-Type" ":" type "/" subtype
>                *(";" parameter)
>                ; Matching of media type and subtype
>                ; is ALWAYS case-insensitive.
>
>- Roland
>
>
>        Roland Turner | Labs Director
>Singapore | M: +65 96700022
>roland.tur...@trustsphere.com
>
>
>
>________________________________________
>From: dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org> on behalf of Murray 
>Kucherawy via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>
>Sent: Thursday, 12 November 2015 07:05
>To: A. Schulze; dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
>Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] rddmarc & comcast reports
>
>That has to be a syntax error.
>
>On 11/10/15, 12:02 AM, "dmarc-discuss on behalf of A. Schulze via
>dmarc-discuss" <dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org on behalf of
>dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I noticed last week rddmarc fail to read aggregated reports from Comcast.
>>They send an unusual Content-Type: application-x-gzip;
>>No idea if that's right or wrong. The attached patch extend rddmarc to
>>import
>>these reports.
>>
>>Andreas
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>dmarc-discuss mailing list
>dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
>http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
>NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
>(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>
>_______________________________________________
>dmarc-discuss mailing list
>dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
>http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
>NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
>(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>


_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to