State here the bugs you find, we are all ears... On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Peter Bowen via dmarc-discuss < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
> Thanks, that is really helpful. > > It would be really nifty to add a “DMARC 1.0 compliance” percentage next > to each sender. I’m seeing lots of reports that don’t follow the XML > format defined in the RFC. > > Thanks, > Peter > > On Feb 10, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Matt Vernhout <dmarcl...@emailkarma.net> > wrote: > > This is a fairly good list of potential DMARC senders: > https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/ > > Cheers, > > ~ > *MATT VERNHOUT* > Founder, Editor > > EmailKarma.net <http://ekma.co/16G2Htm> > It's not the size of your list, it's how you use it! > > My profiles: <http://ekma.co/1GrpgS5> <http://ekma.co/1bSPqy0> > <http://ekma.co/16G2GFC> <http://ekma.co/16G2Htm> <http://ekma.co/1aqglmS> > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Peter Bowen via dmarc-discuss < > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > >> Does anyone maintain a list of receivers known to send DMARC reports? I >> enabled DMARC reporting for a domain we use for sending and have gotten >> reports so far from 126.com, AOL, Belgacom, CapitalOne, Cisco, Comcast, >> FastMail, Google, Infor, Microsoft, mail.ru, NetEase (163.com), QQ,and >> Yahoo. >> >> From these reports, I’ve seen a number of different variations that do >> not follow the XML Schema in RFC 7489. I know there is the DMARC WG at >> IETF, but I haven’t seen any updates on the core spec, so I’m hoping >> someone implementing DMARC may have sorted out what is considered >> acceptable. >> >> Thanks, >> Peter >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc-discuss mailing list >> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
