DMARC doesn't say anything at all about Reply-to; it only covers the From:
line.So if AOL is enforcing a restriction based on Reply-to, it isn't doing so
based on DMARC.
Requiring Reply-to domain to match or relate to From: is a nice further
protection, particularly for non-DMARC domains, but not as far as I know a
standard.
Elizabeth
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:42 AM, Abhishek Tiwari via dmarc-discuss
<dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
Hi ,
I am very new to this group. Just joined two minutes back :)
I have a question.
We have mailing product and customer is facing this issue : "If the "reply to"
is set to AUTHOR this will not work in sending mailing to AOL as their DMARC
rule are different, they check to see if the reply-to and the From address are
the same if not they will reject with a 521."So the problem seems specific to
AOL.
Please suggest and help
Best RegardsAbhishek
| | Virus-free. www.avast.com |
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
