DMARC doesn't say anything at all about Reply-to; it only covers the From: line.So if AOL is enforcing a restriction based on Reply-to, it isn't doing so based on DMARC. Requiring Reply-to domain to match or relate to From: is a nice further protection, particularly for non-DMARC domains, but not as far as I know a standard. Elizabeth
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:42 AM, Abhishek Tiwari via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: Hi , I am very new to this group. Just joined two minutes back :) I have a question. We have mailing product and customer is facing this issue : "If the "reply to" is set to AUTHOR this will not work in sending mailing to AOL as their DMARC rule are different, they check to see if the reply-to and the From address are the same if not they will reject with a 521."So the problem seems specific to AOL. Please suggest and help Best RegardsAbhishek | | Virus-free. www.avast.com | _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)