On 07.07.2016 18:53, Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss wrote: > > I meant to say that the spec is unclear about what you do about **reporting** > multiple DKIM results. It's perfectly clear on how to evaluate them. > Elizabeth
The way I understand the DMARC RFC it is valid to have multiple dkim sections in one auth_result section, as the RFC states in Appendix C: DMARC XML Scheme: > <!-- This element contains DKIM and SPF results, uninterpreted with respect > to DMARC. --> > <xs:complexType name="AuthResultType"> > <xs:sequence> > <!-- There may be no DKIM signatures, or multiple DKIM signatures. --> > <xs:element name="dkim" type="DKIMAuthResultType" > minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <!-- There will always be at least one SPF result. --> > <xs:element name="spf" type="SPFAuthResultType" minOccurs="1" > maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> Notice the maxOccurs="unbounded" in the element named dkim. Juri _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
