Those headers cannot all be true. If the SPF pass is right, then the DMARC fail
is wrong. Look at fixing the DMARC calculation, not your calculations.
Elizabeth
On Monday, October 3, 2016, 4:59:53 AM PDT, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet via
dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:#yiv4358277168 #yiv4358277168 --
_filtered #yiv4358277168 {font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
_filtered #yiv4358277168 {font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
_filtered #yiv4358277168 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
_filtered #yiv4358277168 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2
4;}#yiv4358277168 #yiv4358277168 p.yiv4358277168MsoNormal, #yiv4358277168
li.yiv4358277168MsoNormal, #yiv4358277168 div.yiv4358277168MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv4358277168 a:link,
#yiv4358277168 span.yiv4358277168MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4358277168 a:visited, #yiv4358277168
span.yiv4358277168MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4358277168 p
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv4358277168
p.yiv4358277168MsoAcetate, #yiv4358277168 li.yiv4358277168MsoAcetate,
#yiv4358277168 div.yiv4358277168MsoAcetate
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:8.0pt;}#yiv4358277168
span.yiv4358277168BalloonTextChar {}#yiv4358277168
span.yiv4358277168EmailStyle21 {color:#002060;}#yiv4358277168
.yiv4358277168MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv4358277168 {margin:72.0pt 72.0pt
72.0pt 72.0pt;}#yiv4358277168 div.yiv4358277168WordSection1 {}#yiv4358277168
Actually I’m parsing the headers and based on the dmarc=fail and further
checking whether it’s from a mailing list - assigning a score in spamassassin.
If I need to use the fail in conjunction with the spf=pass - then that premise
is shot right?
Regards
DP
From: Franck Martin [mailto:fmar...@linkedin.com]
Sent: 03 October 2016 23:56
To: Roland Turner; DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet
Cc: DMARC Discussion List
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc fail for linkedin
Happy to help, but as Roland said the problem seems to be on the receiver side.
SPF is pass and aligned, that alone should do a DMARC pass.
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
<dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
This looks like a receiver-side bug. An SPF pass for bounces.linkedin.com
implies a DMARC pass for linkedin.com so long as the linked.com policy
specifies or defaults to relaxed alignment (it does).
- Roland
|
|
Roland Turner
Labs Director
Mobile: +65 9670 0022
3 Phillip Street, #13-03 Royal Group Building, Singapore 048693
| |
|
|
|
|
|
www.trustsphere.com
|
|
From: dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org> on behalf of DurgaPrasad
- DatasoftComnet via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>
Sent: Sunday, 2 October 2016 23:16
To: 'dmarc-discuss'
Subject: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc fail for linkedin
Hello all,
Why is dmac failing for linkedin?
following sanitised output captured from mailwatch. I thought Linkedin is
active participant of DMARC.
Sometimes it fails for gmail also.
|
Received from:
|
|
108.174.6.157
| |
|
|
Received Via:
|
|
IP Address
|
Hostname
|
Country
|
RBL
|
Spam
|
Virus
|
All
|
|
108.174.6.157
|
mailb-de.linkedin.com
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X-Greylist: delayed 62 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at sync.recvdomain.com; Sun, 02
Oct 2016 20:10:32 IST
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 sync.recvdomain.com 3561F1A4C04
Authentication-Results: sync.recvdomain.com; dmarc=fail header.from=linkedin.com
Authentication-Results: sync.recvdomain.com; spf=pass
smtp.mailfrom=s-2gvpcup5oqbkzh2ybkjw5b561o5y1w1xie7y74qzpfik7kyi2yfqr...@bounce.linkedin.com
Received: from mailb-de.linkedin.com (mailb-de.linkedin.com [108.174.6.157])
by sync.recvdomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3561F1A4C04
for <a...@recvdomain.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 20:10:31 +0530 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com;
s=proddkim1024; t=1475419164;
bh=0BGcec8gfa2UUrhh3rWJw+dpo9wKPor0X6Nmr4swfos=;
h=From:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:To:Date:X-LinkedIn-Class:
X-LinkedIn-Template:X-LinkedIn-fbl;
b=o/PNleMe51U0pZDfW/LAVdNKiv2C4ovHt5yvMj1yrIhPfRBMKGtcGYSk67Vfl7CKx
sHutanfc5qs/eUEKnE3kMH5d2ErQ6PrVf89XBoQJtdLTOkMAAi7xEMFeE3FG0kY7Dw
otmGefhsAJezAVhhv0enUvM5Lho7jEcJ3xFcksls=
From: John Kennedy <invitati...@linkedin.com>
Message-ID:
<401079548.70154.1475419164807.javamail....@lva1-app2439.prod.linkedin.com>
Subject: Abc, please add me to your LinkedIn network
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_70152_1116365500.1475419164803"
To: Abc Ganta <a...@recvdomain.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 14:39:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-LinkedIn-Class: INVITE-MBR
X-LinkedIn-Template: email_m2m_invite_single_01
X-LinkedIn-fbl:
m2-at007hio5vmhecl55aegbrldj55dod8ekz33kb3ea8tqs5z1y4pek73m8v82dh9r3w53jdybhoksmyfs6cs0g1gofydssh0dlrpf0p
X-LinkedIn-Id: 2j1zjf-itsqh361-p8
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:list-unsubscr...@linkedin.com?subject=unsubscribe/AQFHINMWGdBNHwAAAVeF1dCG2mwGmj1UB3Tv6UiVZOiuykyYxJ2Gg2W1-_q2uw2WyTZC3eV8QBIcs-Vn9Xk8qE0eQfg/2j1zjf-itsqh361-p8/m2-at007hio5vmhecl55aegbrldj55dod8ekz33kb3ea8tqs5z1y4pek73m8v82dh9r3w53jdybhoksmyfs6cs0g1gofydssh0dlrpf0p>
Require-Recipient-Valid-Since: a...@recvdomain.com; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:00:00
+0000
|
|
From:
|
|
s-2gvpcup5oqbkzh2ybkjw5b561o5y1w1xie7y74qzpfik7kyi2yfqr...@bounce.linkedin.com
|
|
Regards
Durga Prasad
|
|
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
|
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
| |
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
|
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
