Actually, from the code, I'm surprised we handle a single address with ! correctly. I'll file a bug.
Brandon On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > Hi, > > while writing a patch for OpenDMARC, I stumbled accross problems with the > size limit in DMARC URIs that some of the big players have. > > Microsoft cannot cope at all with an URI like "rep...@example.org!10m" - > you won't receive a single report. > > Yahoo and Google do send a report and respect the size limit - as long as > this URI is the only one in the rua tag. > As soon as one adds another URI (with or without size limit) to the rua > tag, Google and Yahoo forget to strip the size limit from the URI and thus > try to send a mail to "rep...@example.org!10m"! > > As OpenDMARC also had problems with the size limit in older versions, it is > best to avoid the use of size limits for now. > > > Juri > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
