Carl, this is great to hear. Thanks for sharing with us.

Best regards,
Al Iverson

--
Al Iverson
www.aliverson.com
(312)725-0130


On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Carl Windsor via dmarc-discuss
<dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
>>I would suggest a note saying that Fortinet's implementation is
>>known to be fatally buggy.
>
> Hi DMARC Group, I am the Product Manager @ Fortinet for FortiMail and can
> confirm that this was not by design but a bug.  As of 5.3 interim build 625
> we respect the p=none directive and this will be rolled in to the next patch
> release (5.3.8).
>
> Carl Windsor
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to