Carl, this is great to hear. Thanks for sharing with us. Best regards, Al Iverson
-- Al Iverson www.aliverson.com (312)725-0130 On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Carl Windsor via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: >>I would suggest a note saying that Fortinet's implementation is >>known to be fatally buggy. > > Hi DMARC Group, I am the Product Manager @ Fortinet for FortiMail and can > confirm that this was not by design but a bug. As of 5.3 interim build 625 > we respect the p=none directive and this will be rolled in to the next patch > release (5.3.8). > > Carl Windsor > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)