i appear to need atps records for google this is with atps dns text records and probably others
opendmarc-reports: sent report for gmail.com to mailauth-repo...@google.com (2.0.0 Ok: queued as x1) postfix/smtp[28130]: x2: to=<mailauth-repo...@google.com>, relay=aspmx.l.google.com[66.102.1.26]:25, delay=0.87, delays=0.13/0.01/0.25/0.48, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK xx xx - gsmtp) without atps [results i got from last week] postfix/smtp[5820]: x0: to=<mailauth-repo...@google.com>, relay=aspmx.l.google.com[74.125.71.26]:25, delay=1.1, delays=0.13/0.01/0.49/0.43, dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host aspmx.l.google.com[74.125.71.26] said: 550-5.7.1 Unauthenticated email from example.eu is not accepted due to 550-5.7.1 domain's DMARC policy. Please contact the administrator of 550-5.7.1 example.eu domain if this was a legitimate mail. I used (appears to work) dns records _adsp._domainkey.example.eu. "dkim=all atps=y; asl=example.com;" <sha1 of example.com>._atps.example.eu. "v=atps01; d=example.com;" not work (or tried yet) the content made by openmarc-atpszone v=ATPS1; d=example.net The windows version appears to be the winner for syntax of atps. although i can get sha1 domain name hashes from both with. opendkim-atpszone -h sha1 -u example.com -A example.net So most of opendkim-atpszone is best ignored it appears On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss wrote: > > I encountered a opendmarc bug that required adsp records as well to send > > dmarc reports and i had a fun time trying to reproduce the output for i > do > > not know how long the url i mention will last. > > > Is nearly the same but I am confused - is the web parser right and the > > opendkim-atpszone command wrong? with v=ATPS1 > > > I ask as this affects only dmarc reports (no i do not run example.com) > our > > normal email is sent ok > > Even though this is not an OpenDMARC specific mailing list but a generic > DMARC > discussion list, can you be a bit more specific in which way OpenDMARC > reports > are affected by the differing output of the webtool vs. opendkim-atpszone? > > Juri > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
