On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:45 AM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: >>They have an obligation, to everyone, to get it right, irregardless of >>sender preferences. > > I have to say that it's amusing that someone apparently believes that > every DMARC installation in the world should rewrite their code, > breaking backward compatibility,
The funny thing is, I never said that anyone should rewrite their code or break backwards compatibility. I've only stated that receivers should not send false positives. > merely because he can't be bothered > to learn how to use the analysis tools that everyone else uses. Sadly this is a false statement by you John. I've provided you and others with links to prove that I have the tools to identify problems at at least 4 receivers. > But perhaps this discussion can be over now. Not with false and misleading statements/assumptions. -Jim P. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
