>From our recent logs, it looks like it was updated from p=none to p=reject on sometime around 2/23 1p PDT ... probably because of this note.
Brandon On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:52 PM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > In article <CAEO096q9wB0PBUTSBTGypRB8G1qHd3xV5qQQO16xpRe2zGLWNQ@mail. > gmail.com> you write: > > > >One of our mailing list members, with a netscape.net email address, is > >getting DMARC bounces. That domain is set to p=none. > > That hasn't been the case for quite a while. > > $ dig _dmarc.netscape.net txt > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;_dmarc.netscape.net. IN TXT > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > _dmarc.netscape.net. 60 IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=reject; > fo=1; pct=100; ri=3600; rua=mailto:a...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto: > a...@ruf.agari.com" > > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
