Hi On Thu 19/Apr/2018 08:30:04 +0200 Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss wrote: > On 2018-04-19 07:55, A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss wrote: >> since some days aggregated reports we generate using an other software: >> rspamd These reports are invisible at dmarcian.com. I would like to ask >> the group to review my reports if they are syntactical valid. Yeah, there seem to be no DMARC report validators around...
> This is what I found: > - wrong MIME type: expected: text/xml (.xml); found: application/xml (.xml) I found text/xml as required > - missing <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> at the top I had that. However, I missed the <version> element inside <feedback>. > - not gziped Although this is optional, I think that's the reason why I don't "see" your reports. In addition, they're not pretty printed. If I were you, I'd use BCC: to address dmarc-send. hth Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
