Calendaring corner cases are numerous. If the calendaring system is to
co-operate with DMARC (but note that it's not a foregone conclusion that
the operator will want to do so) the options in this case would appear
to be:
* Take ownership of the forwarded message by setting From: to the
address of the person forwarding (as Outlook does with all other
forwarding). Whether this will play nice with recipients'
calendaring software is not clear.
* Forward unmodified, so the original DKIM signature will still validate.
There probably aren't particularly tidy answers to this.
- Roland
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 26/09/18 00:48, Ivan Kovachev via dmarc-discuss wrote:
Hello guys,
would anyone be able to comment on the issue listed here:
https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/264636-general/suggestions/34012756-forwarding-of-calendar-appointments-from-a-dmarc-p
I have also run some tests using a DMARC protected domain in reject
mode and hotmail whether *manually forwarding*,*auto-forwarding* or
*redirecting* the email treats the email in the same way and that is:
retains the original From domain but the final recipient does the SPF
and DKIM checks on the forwarder ie. hotmail so DMARC fails and emails
are rejected.
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
