With some of my recent DMARC reports for my domains I've seen comments about over riding the p=reject and deciding the mail should be quarantined vs rejected because the recipient mailbox provider thought it was forwarded.
Would it be useful to add an additional DMARC be expanded to have a 'p=nomail' value so when a domain that is already publishing "v=spf1 -all" and has a 'p=reject' value that it really should be rejected regardless of what the recipient domain thinks about a mail being forwarded or not? I see that this could also be valuable for parked domains, expired domains and defensive domain registrations to provide additional levels of clarity where a recipient network is trying to make the effort to deliver email but due to their internal decision making are delivering mail that they shouldn't be. ~ *MATT*
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
