Thanks for the reply - So pertaining to my same query; if the message would be aligned in below scenario? I am still scratching my head :(
1 - aspf=s adkim=s from: [email protected] return-path: [email protected] d=example.com spf=neutral Or since aspf=s then should be spf=pass? What would happen in the auto-forwarding scenario? sine again spf would I guess break? On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 3:23 PM Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss < [email protected]> wrote: > On Sun 27/Sep/2020 09:14:46 +0200 Blason R via dmarc-discuss wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > I am starting with DMARC implementation and analysing the XML report > without > > any GUI tool just to clear my understanding. Can someone please confirm > if > > below marked in *bold* is correct? > > > Yup, it sounds correct. > > > > <policy_published> > > <domain>example.com</domain> ==> DMARC Policy published by our > domain example.com; referred by Reporting ORG? > > > Example.org is the domain where the reporting ORG got a DMARC record from. > That is, the From: domain of the messages reported in a given report. > > > > <adkim>r</adkim> > > <aspf>r</aspf> > > <p>none</p> > > <pct>100</pct> > > <fo>0</fo> > > </policy_published> > > > [...] > > > <policy_evaluated> > > <disposition>none</disposition> *==> Action taken on the mail by > Reporting Org??* > > > Just how evaluating the policy affected the action. For example, consider > a > message which got 15 spam points and was therefore quarantined. That has > nothing to do with DMARC, so "none" can be correct. > > Some say "pass" instead of "none", meaning the same. > > > > <dkim>pass</dkim> > > <spf>pass</spf> > > > That includes alignment considerations. > > > > </policy_evaluated> *--> What Policy is evaluated* > > > It should be the policy referred as "published" above. Some reporting > ORGs > send multiple records in case a sender changes policy during the day, > collecting the corresponding evaluations. I wouldn't count much on that; > reports about policy changes should be interpreted with a grain of salt. > > > Best > Ale > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
