Just to concur with Dave's points: We're not in any kind of formal process at this stage. There is a deadline to getting updates published prior to the Vancouver meeting just so we are all reasonably sure we're all looking at the same draft when we meet there. It's this coming Monday. On the Monday of the conference (November 4th), the embargo is lifted, and normal document evolution resumes. That's the deadline to which I was referring.
-MSK On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Roland Turner <rol...@rolandturner.com>wrote: > Ah, this suggests an answer to a process question that I'd been meaning > to ask: which cutoff? (More broadly, are the remaining steps documented > somewhere?) > > - Roland > > > > On 10/16/2013 08:56 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm planning to scrape this list for items that would be good to include > in a revision to the draft and post it prior to the cutoff. I'll post > again when I have a diff available for review. > > I'll reply to the list as I go through the feedback. > > -MSK > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing listdmarc@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc > > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
