On May 24, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Hector Santos <hsan...@isdg.net> wrote:
> Off hand, I think the DMARC draft needs to be updated for two basic > fundamental parts: > > 1) Separate Policy Handling and Reporting. If I read the draft right, > reporting is mandatory. Reporting should not be mandatory to DMARC > receivers. Not all receivers will want to add this huge overhead component > just to support the most important part; the security policy portion of the > protocol. Reporting is bound to be ignored and the DMARC draft should > recognize this reality by not making essential nor necessary. Could you point to the areas within the draft that led you to believe that reporting is mandatory? Matt _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
