On 5/28/2014 6:47 PM, Arvel Hathcock wrote: > That's right. But maybe there could be a multipart/dkim type that lets > several signatures exist in a message - all of which could potentially > verify with different d=.
Hi Arvel. Great to see you re-entering the fray... Picking a nit: It's not a MIME level issue. It's in the main header. More substantive: Multiple signatures are ok now. And are sometimes done now. So the real challenge is who should sign what and how should it/they get used? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
