Douglas Otis writes: > Rather than issuing click through agreements to in essence say "All > your email must represent direct transactions from the provider." > they could offer users a friendly SMTP compatible and safe solution > that provides MUA configurations that expose aligned Sender header > fields in lieu of aligned From header fields.
I think implementing this suggestion would a disservice to the users at both ends. The requisitioning author (a business) wants *her* address, not the 3rd party's (Intuit's) address visible. The recipient *also* wants to see and has a trust relationship with the requisitioning author, not with Intuit. This is not about MUAs AFAICS, it's about how an Author Domain can tell a recipient MTA (DMARC verifier) that a particular sending MTA may use the Author Domain in From. This needs no help from the MUA (unless it's a DMARC verifier itself), and need not be visible at all to the user. > What is standing the the way of DANE deployment for both client and > server? Money and competent sysadmin time sound like candidates to me. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
